Chrisland School Lekki Lagos Supervisor Sent To Kirikiri For Defiling Pupil

chrisland school supervisor jailed

Chrisland School Lekki Lagos Supervisor Sent To Kirikiri For Defiling Pupil

Justice Sybil Nwaka of an Ikeja Sexual Offences and Domestic Violence Court on yesterday revoked the bail of Chrisland School Supervisor, Adegboyega Adenekan standing trial for allegedly defiling a two-year-old pupil (names withheld) of the school.

Justice Nwaka revoked Adenekan’s bail for one day after expressing concerns that he might become a flight risk and not come to court at the next adjourned date fixed for Wednesday.

The judge took the decision after Adenekan was led in defense for over an hour by his counsel, Olatunde Adejuyigbe (SAN).

At the end of his defence, the trial judge declined to let him go back home in line with the bail he has been enjoying but rather sent him to Kirikiri Prisons.

“My intuition is telling me that the defendant may not appear tomorrow for the continuation of his trial. For his own security I am hereby revoking his bail and order that he be remanded in Kirikiri Prisons until the next adjourned date,” the Judge ruled.

The defendant is facing alone count charge of child defilement before the court.

During resumed proceedings, Adenekan told the court that he found the allegations that he defiled a pupil of the school as ‘false and highly embarrassing’.

The defendant told the court that he had built a teaching career spanning over 23 years and that no parent has ever accused him of child defilement.

When the defendant was asked how he met the victim’s mother, the school supervisor said he knew the mother of the survivor as one of the parent of pupils at Chrisland School, Ajah, Victoria Garden City.

He said he became aware of the allegation against him on November 14, 2016.

“It was on a Friday around 8pm, I received a call from an unknown number and she introduced as a parent in the school. She outrightly told me that I had sexually abused her two-year-old daughter.

“I was shocked at the allegation. She now further went on to tell me that we should keep the matter between the two of us and not tell anyone.

“She ended the call and thereafter sent me a message that read: ‘I want you to still be friendly with my child’.

Adenekan claimed to still have on his phone the text message sent to him by mother of the survivor.

He also claimed to have told his wife about the discussion he had on my phone.

The defendant told the court that he was also threatened by the father of the survivor.

Adenekan said he reported the matter to the Head Teacher as a result of which a meeting was convened, with the survivor’s mother in attendance.

“During the meeting it was concluded that the child should be examined by the school hospital. The mother refused. She later called her husband who gave his consent”.

Adenekan said it was the mother of the survivor that made arrangement for a polygraph test to be conducted on him by Halogen Securities in Maryland and that he consented because he had nothing to hide.

“I was shocked when the report of the Halogen test came back and it said that I was lying. I strongly believe that the child’s mother and the security company that conducted the test fabricated the results.

“The child was in pre-school 1 when I met her. I only stand at the door of their class and say, ‘hello children.’ The class teacher and the two class assistants are usually there. I have never been alone with the child in question i have never taken her out of the class to.my office, ” he said.

When asked if he defiled the child, he said, ” I have two daughters aged fourteen and sixteen. I would never allow someone do such to my children.

“ I have been married for 18 years. My wife is even here. I have no special relationship with the child.

When the school supervisor was asked if he knew the child drew his penis, he said, “I heard she drew a penis but that is between her and her mother.

“I have never exposed my penis to this child neither have I fingered her or put my penis in her vagina.

“I am very sure everything is fabricated, “Adenekan said.

The two-year-old in her testimony had earlier accused the defendant of defiling her.

She had told the court, “Mr Adenekan put his wee wee (penis) in my bum bum (vagina).

State Prosecutor, B.T Boye had called about six witnesses who testified before the court while the defence had called two teachers of the school who described the defendant as a role model.

Adenekan was forced to open his defence after the court dismissed his application in which he submitted that he had no case to answer.

The trial judge, Justice Nwaka adjourned the matter till tomorrow for cross-examination of the defendant.

7 thoughts on “Chrisland School Lekki Lagos Supervisor Sent To Kirikiri For Defiling Pupil

  1. 2 yr old for christ sake…what is this madness?someone running an educational institution..i profer death penalty to these rapists than all this stretched court proceedings.let them put cctv everywhere.classrooms,staff room,headmistress/principals office.

  2. From the narrative above, the mother of the survivor is out for demolition, either she was hired to do that or she had something with the teacher or the teacher resemble someone who maltreated her in the past.

    If there will be a good investigation, the truth must be out.

  3. Investigations should be thoroughly carried out. This is a very serious issue and the man might be falsely accused for all we know. You will be surprised how kids under 5 like to draw penis for the fun of it. I hope they wont be hasty in drawing conclusions

  4. Investigations should be thoroughly carried out. This is a very serious issue and the man might be falsely accused for all we know at least based on this man’s testimony and that of the members of staff. You will be surprised how kids under 5 like to draw penis for the fun of it. I hope they wont be hasty in drawing conclusions

  5. pls, let the wife go to MFM to pray, is an arrow fire to disgrace and to destroy him totally.Evil arrow from the coven go back to the sender in the name of Jesus.

  6. Let’s apply critical thinking here based on the above story. I don’t think this guy did what he was alleged of doing because of evidence presented in this case. Having said this doesn’t mean that some sickening pedophiles cannot do it but in this case there is no strong evidence to show that this man did it.

    Polygraph rest has been using in many western world to establish the fact that whether the accusee is lying or not and this test has not been proven 100% accurate in most cases. I have watched a documentary program where a criminal passed the polygraph test and it was detected later that he was indeed lying. Evidence behind this case has to be strongly established for example, if there was a letter from a reputable Doctor that the toddler was violated then that is admissible but having a 2 year old drawing a penis to use that as an evidence in the law court is awkward and unsustainable. You don’t have to be a judge before you can decide on a case like this. To my understanding, the mother of this toddler is suspicious of her daughter being defiled and quickly rushed to the court. Common folks! a 2 year old girl barely knew nothing let alone testifying. It could have been a different case if that toddler is around 5 or 6 years old. I’m not judging this case but this is a lost case due to inability of the kid’s mother to go through the right channel. A good lawyer can get this man out of the prison in less than 5 minutes.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *